Sample comparison report
84Provider ABCB-licensed LatAm payment institutionSubject to provider due diligenceCoverage fit 78Pricing (indicative) 88Settlement speed 90↓
Strongest LatAm corridor depth among respondents. Native PIX + SPEI removes correspondent hop on the two highest-volume legs. Onboarding fastest in the cohort.
78Provider BMulti-rail orchestrator (Swiss FI + OTC partner)Subject to provider due diligenceCoverage fit 92Pricing (indicative) 74Risk fit 84↓
Strongest overall coverage. Costlier on transaction fees and FX spread but the only respondent that covers the NGN leg cleanly. Best fit for buyers who value redundancy over best-in-class corridor pricing.
75Provider CPan-emerging market payout specialistSubject to provider due diligenceCoverage fit 80Pricing (indicative) 80Settlement speed 82↓
Best fit if NGN + INR are commercial priorities. BRL gap is the main constraint. Prefunding requirement may not work for cash-flow-sensitive buyers.
71Provider DVASP-licensed stablecoin / Lightning specialistSubject to provider due diligenceCoverage fit 88Pricing (indicative) 92Settlement speed 96↓
Lowest pricing and fastest settlement, but the model places stablecoin custody and off-ramp friction on the recipient side. Strong fit for crypto-native marketplaces; weaker for traditional sellers without wallet infrastructure.
63Provider EGeneralist PSP / acquirerSubject to provider due diligenceCoverage fit 58Risk fit 72Onboarding feasibility 86↓
Fastest onboarding because the buyer already operates with them on card acquiring. Wider spreads and missing BRL/NGN make this a fallback rather than a primary route.
Scores are Railflows' directional assessment based on available RFQ and provider response information. Final pricing, onboarding approval and commercial terms are subject to provider due diligence and agreement. This is a sample report — all figures are illustrative.
This is what the comparison output looks like.
Your version is shaped by your corridors, volume band and settlement requirements — and only the providers who actually responded to your RFQ. Provider identities stay private until you approve a reveal.